Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Lighthouse Finance Hub
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-27 02:08:57
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (562)
Related
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Former All-Star, World Series champion pitcher Ken Holtzman dies
- Gossip Influencer Kyle Marisa Roth’s Sister Shares Family Update After Her Death at 36
- Sofía Vergara Goes Instagram Official With Dr. Justin Saliman in Cheeky Post
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- O.J. Simpson’s Estate Executor Speaks Out After Saying He’ll Ensure the Goldmans “Get Zero, Nothing”
- Why is tax day on April 15? Here's what to know about the history of the day
- Supreme Court to examine federal obstruction law used to prosecute Trump and Jan. 6 rioters
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- In war saga ‘The Sympathizer,’ Vietnamese voices are no longer stuck in the background
Ranking
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- The Talk to sign off for good in December after 15 seasons
- Rust armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed sentenced to 18 months in prison over deadly 2021 shooting
- 2025 Kia K4 Sedan first look: Introducing Kia’s all-new small, cheap car
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Decades after a US butterfly species vanished, a close relative is released to fill gap
- Alexa and Carlos PenaVega Share Stillbirth of Baby No. 4
- Asbestos victim’s dying words aired in wrongful death case against Buffet’s railroad
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Horoscopes Today, April 15, 2024
He didn't want her to have the baby. So he poisoned their newborn's bottle with antifreeze.
Ciara Reveals Why She Wants to Lose 70 Pounds of Her Post-Baby Weight
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
USA Basketball finalizing 11 players for Paris Olympics, led by LeBron James, Steph Curry
An Opportunity for a Financial Revolution: The Rise of the Wealth Forge Institute
Abu Ghraib detainee shares emotional testimony during trial against Virginia military contractor